H.E.S.S. follow-up observations of Binary Black Hole Coalescence events during the second and third Gravitational Waves observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo

Abstract

We report on the observations of four well-localized binary black hole (BBH) mergers by the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) during the second and third observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, O2 and O3. H.E.S.S. can observe 20 deg2 of the sky at a time and follows up gravitational-wave (GW) events by “tiling” localization regions to maximize the covered localization probability. During O2 and O3, H.E.S.S. observed large portions of the localization regions, between 35% and 75%, for four BBH mergers (GW170814, GW190512_180714, GW190728_064510, and S200224ca). For these four GW events, we find no significant signal from a pointlike source in any of the observations, and we set upper limits on the very high energy (>100 GeV) γ-ray emission. The 1–10 TeV isotropic luminosity of these GW events is below 1045 erg s−1 at the times of the H.E.S.S. observations, around the level of the low-luminosity GRB 190829A. Assuming no changes are made to how follow-up observations are conducted, H.E.S.S. can expect to observe over 60 GW events per year in the fourth GW observing run, O4, of which eight would be observable with minimal latency.

Auxiliary informations

GW170814

Content     GW170814    
Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

Fig. 2 and Fig.6

GW170814_1-10_IntULMap_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

GW170814_1-10_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

Luminosity limits

1/(1+z)TeV < E < 10/(1+z)TeV

Fig. 3 and Fig.8

GW170814_1-10_Lum_published_version.fits

Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

Fig. 7

GW170814_IntULMap_E0.42-34.8_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

GW170814_specificErange_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

GW190512_180714

Content     GW190512_180714    
Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

Fig. 2 and Fig.6

S190512at_1-10_IntULMap_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

S190512at_1-10_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

Luminosity limits

1/(1+z)TeV < E < 10/(1+z)TeV

Fig. 3 and Fig.8

S190512at_1-10_Lum_published_version.fits

Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

Fig. 7

S190512at_IntULMap_E3.58_0.31-38.31_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

S190512at_specificErange_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

GW190728_064510

Content     GW190728_064510    
Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

Fig. 2 and Fig.6

S190728q_1-10_IntULMap_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

S190728q_1-10_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

Luminosity limits

1/(1+z)TeV < E < 10/(1+z)TeV

Fig. 3 and Fig.8

S190728q_1-10_Lum_published_version.fits

Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

Fig. 7

S190728q_IntULMap_E0.35-26.10_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

S190728q_specificErange_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

S200224ca

Content     S200224ca    
Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

Fig. 2 and Fig.6

S200224ca_1-10_IntULMap_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum

1TeV < E < 10TeV

S200224ca_1-10_ULIntEFlux_published_version.fits

Luminosity limits

1/(1+z)TeV < E < 10/(1+z)TeV

Fig. 3 and Fig.8

S200224ca_1-10_Lum_published_version.fits

Integral upper limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

Fig. 7

S200224ca_IntULMap_E0.24-38.31_published_version.fits

Integral energy flux limits assuming an E^-2 spectrum and EBL absorption

individual energy ranges (cf. Tab. 2)

S200224ca_specificErange_ULIntfFlux_published_version.fits

Collaboration Acknowledgement

The support of the Namibian authorities and of the University of Namibia in facilitating the construction and operation of H.E.S.S. is gratefully acknowledged, as is the support by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), the Max Planck Society, the German Research Foundation (DFG), the Helmholtz Association, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS/IN2P3 and CNRS/INSU), the Commissariat à l’Énergie atomique et aux Énergies alternatives (CEA), the U.K. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the National Science Centre, Poland grant no. 2016/22/M/ST9/00382, the South African Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation, the University of Namibia, the National Commission on Research, Science & Technology of Namibia (NCRST), the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), the Australian Research Council (ARC), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and by the University of Amsterdam. We appreciate the excellent work of the technical support staff in Berlin, Zeuthen, Heidelberg, Palaiseau, Paris, Saclay, Tübingen and in Namibia in the construction and operation of the equipment. This work benefited from services provided by the H.E.S.S. Virtual Organisation, supported by the national resource providers of the EGI Federation.